Плавучие АЭС, Экономика и |
Здравствуйте, гость ( Вход | Регистрация )
Плавучие АЭС, Экономика и |
21.5.2007, 23:56
Сообщение
#1
|
|
Новичок Группа: Haunters Сообщений: 24 Регистрация: 13.4.2007 Пользователь №: 39 |
Прикидки экономики:
Объявленная стоимость: 200 млн. долл. Объявленная окупаемость: 7 лет Процент рефинансирования ЦБ: 10.5% Стоимость с учетом процентов: 402 млн. долл. Стоимость у учетом процентов: 9 центов за кВт*час (без учета - 4.6). То есть, примерно 2р20к за киловатт*час. Это только кап. затраты. Тарифи по РОссии на следующий год: Камчатка - 5р29 Чукотка - 6р67 Остальной Дальний Восток - от 1р80 до 2р60. Есть еще Коми - 2р58 и Ненецкий АО - 3р70. В остальных регионах тариф редко превышает 2р. Это максимальная граница тарифов. Интересно, какую экономику закладывали организаторы? |
|
|
Guest |
14.6.2007, 2:44
Сообщение
#2
|
Guests |
Добавлю свои пять копеек про первую плавучую АЭС в США.
MH-1A (mobile, high-powered, first of a kind, field installation) Location: Gatun Lake, Canal Zone Principal nuclear contractor: Martin, $17-million contract Pressurized water reactor, Capacity: 10,000 net kW(e), Authorized 45,000 kW(t), Initial criticality, 1967; Shutdown (permanently), 1976. Unlike the smaller Army reactors, it had a low enriched uranium core. Eventually, even the MH-1A became too expensive to maintain. Like all of the Army's nuclear power plants, it was a one-of-a-kind machine, with a unique set of spare parts, operating procedures and machinery quirks. It also required a group of highly trained specialists, all of whom required a regular rotation away from the plant in order to continue their Army careers. The burden of maintaining several unique specialties, ensuring adequate training, and keeping a suitable management structure was difficult for one small generating plant to handle on its own merits. Like most nuclear plant retirements, the actual situation that resulted in its retirement was the need for a relatively minor system update that might have been completed had it been one of many plants. If MH-1A had been one of many similar plants, the cost of the planning and design work needed for the job could have been amortized over several units. Instead of being the forerunner for a series of similar machines, MH-1A has been relegated to the status of historical footnote. Its former operators gather along with the former operators of other Army plants, sharing memories and wondering why their pioneering efforts went for naught. |
|
|
Текстовая версия | Сейчас: 14.6.2024, 1:30 |