Все пациенты знают, наверно. Но все равно профильный сайт не должен вроде проходить мимо такой новости. Wall Street Journal слегка наезжает на РБМК, говорит, что нет у них правильных контейнментов. При этом Фукусиму не упоминает.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405...eTabs%3Darticle

Черт, статья сегодня уже целиком не отображается.

Из комментариев:

"50 miles from St Petersburg and Rosatom is taking a tiny chance to even 1 to 100,000 that historical St Petersburg becomes a ghost city. With their financial success of the last ten years they feel invicible now."

"The article reads: "Critics say Russians would rather squeeze more power out of the old reactors than build expensive new ones". Replace "Russians" with ________________ (Americans, etc.). Replace "old reactors" with ____________________ (any technology - US reactors, old coal-fired plants, old gas-fired plants, etc.). This is pretty much the state of the world."

"As the article stated, Russia would rather keep operating its own nuclear plants and sell its natural gas into the world market for hard currency. Without the German decision to shut down its nuclear plants, there would not have been as large a world market for that gas as there will be as German nuclear plants shut down prematurely."